Hello, good day.
I pass hereby in order to make a suggestion, which consists of giving the majority of users the possibility to use private text channels, which can currently only be used by administrators and moderators of the platform. It seems to me that this is a very powerful feature, and since it is already partially implemented, it would not be too difficult to extend it to all players.
This would allow, for example, me to be at a table of uno, my friend Pepito at a table of ninety nine, and my friend Juana at a free table talking with two friends, but we can all communicate with everyone quickly because we are planning to do a podcast. Another example could be its implementation to talk between different participants of a tournament and be able to balance schedules.
In no case is this a requirement, I am simply suggesting something from the perspective of a regular user on the platform. I think the work done on this is great, and should be highly valued.
Regards.

This would be so much useful for the tournaments, I saw it specially this weekend when I organised Spades tournament.
We were three organisers, we had table masters, and matches were played on 8 different tables, if there was a problem, information or anything else to be informed of it was so difficult to coordinate, for example a player tells me scores, then I have to pm scores to other two organisers.
I hope Aminiel can do something about this, I know we have inbox but it is not so efficient, not enough quick and it has it's limit of people, it's like a mailbox so you don't want to have it spammed with 20 different topics.

This is a great suggestion, but some players like to complicate things, although this suggestion was previously discussed here: https://qcsalon.net/en/forum8/topic51243

Great suggestion. Thumbs up!

Hello, good day.
I've been watching the thread shared by @Qais, and I think I can propose a solution to the problem of managing these channels, among other things:

• On the one hand, implement a password system for each channel that is randomly generated, in such a way that no user can predict possible passwords to these channels and enter to bother.
• In addition, the option to participate (Write) in them could be enabled at the same time that the possibility of intervening in the forum is activated. In turn, increase the requirements of this last characteristic and therefore of both (More hours or rounds of play, time connected on the platform, etc.).
• This would mean that, in order to enter the channels, you must have the name and password, or the latter. Therefore, only users authorized by its creator could enter, as they did not know and could not logically obtain the channel access key.
• Regarding the management, I think that a system of bans similar to that of the free tables would be sufficient if the previous proposal were applied, which by itself would reduce the amount of problems that may arise.
• Finally, and if you want to reduce even more problems, you could set a limit of active users in the channel simultaneously. That is, infinite people can enter the channel, but there can only be seven, fourteen or as many players as set by the developers connected to the channel at the same time.
I await opinions on the suggestions above.
Regards.

quite a convoluted message. Using translators to try to communicate with so much spanish slang is just depressing. I am afraid. I would say that group channels are better, and so you create a group and just tell the group things globally and that's it. Like private messages, but for groups. So you tipe in a symbol a and a space and a message, and that's it. They would have to be created in a per session basis anyway.

sorry for going off topic here, but That was not cool to the post on top of mine. Calling someone out for using a translation program, and calling there variation of the spanish language spanish slang. Uncalled for. as for the general topic, The ability to make hashtag groups so instead of the at simble, use a hashtag name of group. When a person creats a group, they can be asked if they want a password on the group or open to anyone. and then for admin controls to the origional creaters there can be something for example #uno2021(b) HermfyPermfy or k, or what ever, to remove or ban me from that group. As for when the password is asked is when you first try to message that group. Just ideas.